<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DUHC scrambles to counter corporate-friendly U.S. Supreme Court ruling – February 24, 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arcataeye.com/2010/02/duhc-scrambles-to-counter-corporate-friendly-u-s-supreme-court-ruling-%E2%80%93-february-24-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2010/02/duhc-scrambles-to-counter-corporate-friendly-u-s-supreme-court-ruling-%e2%80%93-february-24-2010/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=duhc-scrambles-to-counter-corporate-friendly-u-s-supreme-court-ruling-%25e2%2580%2593-february-24-2010</link>
	<description>The mildly objectionable weekly newspaper for Arcata, California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:19:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2010/02/duhc-scrambles-to-counter-corporate-friendly-u-s-supreme-court-ruling-%e2%80%93-february-24-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcataeye.com/?p=272#comment-281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fred&#039;s right. What about the Orgs? ACORN? MoveOn.Org... And a million more. How about the Unions? SEIU? etc etc etc.... Cobb only wants to hamstring the businesses so that the Orgs and the Unions can attack with impunity, with no way to fight back.

His Measure T was tossed out as UNCONSTITUTIONAL - and no matter how many funny lawyers he brings in pretending to be experts, he can&#039;t get around that fact, and he can&#039;t be honest about his true motives. 

He did provide us with this little gem, though - well worth your time: http://www.votelocalcontrol.org/gallegos.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred&#8217;s right. What about the Orgs? ACORN? MoveOn.Org&#8230; And a million more. How about the Unions? SEIU? etc etc etc&#8230;. Cobb only wants to hamstring the businesses so that the Orgs and the Unions can attack with impunity, with no way to fight back.</p>
<p>His Measure T was tossed out as UNCONSTITUTIONAL &#8211; and no matter how many funny lawyers he brings in pretending to be experts, he can&#8217;t get around that fact, and he can&#8217;t be honest about his true motives. </p>
<p>He did provide us with this little gem, though &#8211; well worth your time: <a href="http://www.votelocalcontrol.org/gallegos.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.votelocalcontrol.org/gallegos.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Mangels</title>
		<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2010/02/duhc-scrambles-to-counter-corporate-friendly-u-s-supreme-court-ruling-%e2%80%93-february-24-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Mangels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcataeye.com/?p=272#comment-259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is simply another attempt at a power play by Democracy Unlimited to give the Left a political advantage, just as they tried to do with Measure T a few years ago. They want unions to be able to contribute billions to left wing political causes, but businesses to not be able to do the same.

If they were concerned about unions, as well, at least you could say they were being even handed about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is simply another attempt at a power play by Democracy Unlimited to give the Left a political advantage, just as they tried to do with Measure T a few years ago. They want unions to be able to contribute billions to left wing political causes, but businesses to not be able to do the same.</p>
<p>If they were concerned about unions, as well, at least you could say they were being even handed about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
