Comments on: Jeff Schwartz: Paul Gallegos Is The Only Logical Alternative For Hagen Supporters – October 23, 2010

By: Robert Benson

Robert Benson — Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:52:21 +0000

DISCLAIMER: “Just get a gun and serve it yourself.” was purely parodical satire. Do no attempt unless in grave danger.

By: DA race heats up at the Arcata Eye « Sohum Parlance II

DA race heats up at the Arcata Eye « Sohum Parlance II — Tue, 26 Oct 2010 20:34:08 +0000

[...] Schwarz then wrote a piece encouraging Hagen voters to support Paul [...]

By: Robert Benson

Robert Benson — Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:35:21 +0000

As, at the time of prosecution, Gallegos’ wife was representing Police Chief Gunderson’s wife in their divorce; the issue of conflict of interest is forthcoming, as is Gallegos’ ethics. As Gallegos’ PALCO fiasco never made it passed the pleading phase, it appears to have been for the headlines. I grow tired of the insults to my intelligence. Aside from the misinformation, what has Gallegos done? Every purported accomplishment, by Gallegos, is an act of deception. Where is the accountability? Where is the good faith? Gallegos is a derelict perjurer, in the strictest sense. Humboldt would be better off without a District Attorney, at least then the People would not rely on these derelicts to find justice. Just get your gun and serve it yourself. Good luck!

By: JUL

JUL — Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:01:55 +0000

It is said that the late Roger Rodoni used to ask the constituents who came to him in support of a project, “Who’s against it?” This is a good question because often the merits of a project or a candidate are more apparent from the nature of the opposition than from statements of supporters.
Who is opposing District Attorney Gallegos? A woman whom he fired from the DA’s office, who has falsely claimed endorsements that were not made, who rails against the practice of plea bargains but has not brought forward any fresh ideas for coping with the office’s workload, and who is willing to exploit the grief of victims’ families in order to win this election.
Approximately 11,000 cases a year cross the DA’s desk in this county. Inevitably, with that volume, someone will be dissatisfied with the outcome of a case, but Paul Gallegos has stood up to the giant corporations in the timber and healthcare industries, has led the effort to administer marijuana law in a compassionate and responsible manner, and has when necessary prosecuted law enforcement officials, Ms. Jackson’s most visible supporters. Please join me in re-electing Paul Gallegos, a District Attorney for ALL the people.

Julie Timmons

By: Angela

Angela — Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:24:11 +0000

Here is who I vote for:

* My daughter’s recovery;
* Student Representation;
* All the victims that have been unprotected and misrepresented by the Humboldt County District Attorney’s Office;
* Justice To Be Restored” by holding even the District Attorney’s Office to the highest standard of law; and
* “Integrity” for any candidate that runs for office.

By: Rose

Rose — Mon, 25 Oct 2010 03:23:11 +0000

Pretty funny. Gallegos told the entire Rotary that he didn’t “know” if he had any donations from GROWERS.

But, his latest fundraiser is SPONSORED by the newly minted “growers association.”

After all his waxing poetic about having to keep his distance from law enforcement because – gasp – he might have to prosecute them – he sure has none of the same scruples when it comes to the growers.

Just another example of his words meaning nothing. And we all know the pretend scruples were just spin to cover for the fact that he can’t get the endorsement of the people who have to work with him.

Spin. Like losing grants is “weaning himself.”

You have to ask yourself, is there anything he has told the truth about yet – claiming to be a Professor, claiming to have created programs he didn’t create, cobbling together crime stats from years he wasn’t in office, trying to play Mr. Law&Order, sneaking self congratulatory campaign propaganda into a Bd. of Supervisors proclamation that was supposed to be honoring the workers..

By: Robert Benson

Robert Benson — Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:33:01 +0000

I apologize for the previous repost. The first post appeared to not register.

By: Robert Benson

Robert Benson — Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:27:59 +0000

I forgot to mention the perjured declaration that Gallegos admitted in CP100272, which covered up the law librarians criminal unauthorized practice of the law and deprived me of my right to redress of grievances. I had given Claim for Damages letters to the law librarian, for sabotaging my computer; and Gallegos, for deliberate indifference to reports of crime. Subsequently, the law librarian conspired with Gallegos to obtain a restraining order for me to stay away from the law library, so I could not research prosecuting them, civilly. The judge (Brown) was a retired visiting judge who has failed to respond to the Motion for New trial or competently answer a declaration of disqualification (recusal); the judge was unabashedly biased against me.

By: Robert Benson

Robert Benson — Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:16:53 +0000

Oh, I almost forgot the perjured declaration Gallegos admitted in CP100272 to cover up the law librarian’s misdemeanor unauthorized practice of law and to deprive my right to redress of grievances. After I gave the law librarian a Claim for Damages (for sabotaging my computer) she got a restraining order for me to stay away from the law library. Now I have no competent access to the law to research prosecuting her or Gallegos, civilly, for damages. I had also given Gallegos a Claim for Damages for deliberate indifference to reports of crime. Gallegos is a criminal, who covers up for criminals. Get em’ Allison.

By: Robert Benson

Robert Benson — Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:04:34 +0000

The following is an excerpt from the bold and beautiful work of http://watchpaul.blogspot.com/ regarding Gallegos’, currently running, FALSE advertising campaign:

“Looks like the press release was already written BEFORE the proclamation was approved. Gallegos tried to use the Board of Supervisors process to sneak in a paragraph giving himself credit for creating a program that we all know he did not create. Then, thinking it was approved AS WAS, they trumpet this as PROOF that he created the program, NOT KNOWING THAT THAT PARAGRAPH WAS DELETED PRIOR TO APPROVAL BECAUSE IT WAS NOT FACTUAL AND EVERYONE KNEW IT.

This is yet another well-orchestrated LIE.

And Bonnie Neely agreed to participate in this knowing that she was throwing her own husband under the bus, knowing that the credit for this program belongs to her husband, knowing that this was false.

This is despicable and disgusting.”

Did I mention that Gallegos has turned a blind eye to three threats on my life, pursuant to my peaceful protesting and seeking redress of grievances; to a county law librarian sabotaging my computer on behalf of Children’s Welfare Service to destroy evidence of a psychologist’s false testimony; to an assault by one who threatened my life for seeking redress of a grievance against the law librarian; and several other crimes. Hello! DA is for District Attorney, not Defense Attorney.