<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andrew Freeman: Why I&#8217;m Not Preparing My Students For The STAR Tests – April 25, 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arcataeye.com/2012/04/andrew-freeman-why-im-not-preparing-my-students-for-the-star-tests-april-25-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2012/04/andrew-freeman-why-im-not-preparing-my-students-for-the-star-tests-april-25-2012/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=andrew-freeman-why-im-not-preparing-my-students-for-the-star-tests-april-25-2012</link>
	<description>The mildly objectionable weekly newspaper for Arcata, California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 06:44:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg King</title>
		<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2012/04/andrew-freeman-why-im-not-preparing-my-students-for-the-star-tests-april-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-63425</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcataeye.com/?p=5572#comment-63425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent letter, Andrew. Thank you so much for your courageous and thoughtful examination of this relatively new testing regime. Your students are lucky.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent letter, Andrew. Thank you so much for your courageous and thoughtful examination of this relatively new testing regime. Your students are lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Emberling</title>
		<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2012/04/andrew-freeman-why-im-not-preparing-my-students-for-the-star-tests-april-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-62901</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Emberling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcataeye.com/?p=5572#comment-62901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t agree more.  In the behavioral observations I do in my early childhood environments, I always begin with the child&#039;s, teacher&#039;s, and parents&#039; strengths and build from there.  Thanks for sharing your perspective.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#039;t agree more.  In the behavioral observations I do in my early childhood environments, I always begin with the child&#039;s, teacher&#039;s, and parents&#039; strengths and build from there.  Thanks for sharing your perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Emberling</title>
		<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2012/04/andrew-freeman-why-im-not-preparing-my-students-for-the-star-tests-april-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-63336</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Emberling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcataeye.com/?p=5572#comment-63336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t agree more.  In the behavioral observations I do in my early childhood environments, I always begin with the child&#039;s, teacher&#039;s, and parents&#039; strengths and build from there.  Thanks for sharing your perspective.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#039;t agree more.  In the behavioral observations I do in my early childhood environments, I always begin with the child&#039;s, teacher&#039;s, and parents&#039; strengths and build from there.  Thanks for sharing your perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Emberling</title>
		<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2012/04/andrew-freeman-why-im-not-preparing-my-students-for-the-star-tests-april-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-63357</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Emberling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcataeye.com/?p=5572#comment-63357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t agree more.  In the behavioral observations I do in my early childhood environments, I always begin with the child&#039;s, teacher&#039;s, and parents&#039; strengths and build from there.  Thanks for sharing your perspective.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#039;t agree more.  In the behavioral observations I do in my early childhood environments, I always begin with the child&#039;s, teacher&#039;s, and parents&#039; strengths and build from there.  Thanks for sharing your perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2012/04/andrew-freeman-why-im-not-preparing-my-students-for-the-star-tests-april-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-62883</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcataeye.com/?p=5572#comment-62883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe one of the goals of assessment should always be to help the teacher refine what  they are doing. Under the government mandated standardized testing mechanism, however, the assessment directs the instruction in a very narrow way. Teachers know that in any given class they have a wide variety of diversity in regards to individual learning needs. Allow the teacher to direct the assessment to reasonably align with those individual needs. What good does it do to continuously pound a one-size-fits-all standardized exam down the throat of a child who is no way ready for it? Allow the teacher to refine their teaching of the class and of individuals based on what they see as being successful and unsuccessful.

This also requires a redefining of what we mean by &quot;assessment&quot;. It should never always be quantitative data. Assessment needs to incorporate qualitative observations, along with the story of the child. 

One of my personal beliefs also is that assessments should always have a positive outcome for the child. First, the assessment should be rich and truly offer the child an opportunity to share what they know, understand, comprehend - and when appropriate offer the opportunity for them to analyze, make an argument, or come to their own conclusion. Second, the outcome of the assessment should always have a focus on accentuating the child&#039;s success, and on making improvements for the future. This simple formula can be applied to a student, who in other terms may have &quot;bombed&quot; or have &quot;aced&quot; the assessment. I approach them the same. There is always something positive to highlight in what they did, and there is always room for improvement. That should be our goal in assessment. To keep the child moving forward in the learning process.     ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe one of the goals of assessment should always be to help the teacher refine what  they are doing. Under the government mandated standardized testing mechanism, however, the assessment directs the instruction in a very narrow way. Teachers know that in any given class they have a wide variety of diversity in regards to individual learning needs. Allow the teacher to direct the assessment to reasonably align with those individual needs. What good does it do to continuously pound a one-size-fits-all standardized exam down the throat of a child who is no way ready for it? Allow the teacher to refine their teaching of the class and of individuals based on what they see as being successful and unsuccessful.</p>
<p>This also requires a redefining of what we mean by &quot;assessment&quot;. It should never always be quantitative data. Assessment needs to incorporate qualitative observations, along with the story of the child. </p>
<p>One of my personal beliefs also is that assessments should always have a positive outcome for the child. First, the assessment should be rich and truly offer the child an opportunity to share what they know, understand, comprehend &#8211; and when appropriate offer the opportunity for them to analyze, make an argument, or come to their own conclusion. Second, the outcome of the assessment should always have a focus on accentuating the child&#039;s success, and on making improvements for the future. This simple formula can be applied to a student, who in other terms may have &quot;bombed&quot; or have &quot;aced&quot; the assessment. I approach them the same. There is always something positive to highlight in what they did, and there is always room for improvement. That should be our goal in assessment. To keep the child moving forward in the learning process.     </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2012/04/andrew-freeman-why-im-not-preparing-my-students-for-the-star-tests-april-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-63335</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcataeye.com/?p=5572#comment-63335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe one of the goals of assessment should always be to help the teacher refine what  they are doing. Under the government mandated standardized testing mechanism, however, the assessment directs the instruction in a very narrow way. Teachers know that in any given class they have a wide variety of diversity in regards to individual learning needs. Allow the teacher to direct the assessment to reasonably align with those individual needs. What good does it do to continuously pound a one-size-fits-all standardized exam down the throat of a child who is no way ready for it? Allow the teacher to refine their teaching of the class and of individuals based on what they see as being successful and unsuccessful.

This also requires a redefining of what we mean by &quot;assessment&quot;. It should never always be quantitative data. Assessment needs to incorporate qualitative observations, along with the story of the child. 

One of my personal beliefs also is that assessments should always have a positive outcome for the child. First, the assessment should be rich and truly offer the child an opportunity to share what they know, understand, comprehend - and when appropriate offer the opportunity for them to analyze, make an argument, or come to their own conclusion. Second, the outcome of the assessment should always have a focus on accentuating the child&#039;s success, and on making improvements for the future. This simple formula can be applied to a student, who in other terms may have &quot;bombed&quot; or have &quot;aced&quot; the assessment. I approach them the same. There is always something positive to highlight in what they did, and there is always room for improvement. That should be our goal in assessment. To keep the child moving forward in the learning process.     ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe one of the goals of assessment should always be to help the teacher refine what  they are doing. Under the government mandated standardized testing mechanism, however, the assessment directs the instruction in a very narrow way. Teachers know that in any given class they have a wide variety of diversity in regards to individual learning needs. Allow the teacher to direct the assessment to reasonably align with those individual needs. What good does it do to continuously pound a one-size-fits-all standardized exam down the throat of a child who is no way ready for it? Allow the teacher to refine their teaching of the class and of individuals based on what they see as being successful and unsuccessful.</p>
<p>This also requires a redefining of what we mean by &quot;assessment&quot;. It should never always be quantitative data. Assessment needs to incorporate qualitative observations, along with the story of the child. </p>
<p>One of my personal beliefs also is that assessments should always have a positive outcome for the child. First, the assessment should be rich and truly offer the child an opportunity to share what they know, understand, comprehend &#8211; and when appropriate offer the opportunity for them to analyze, make an argument, or come to their own conclusion. Second, the outcome of the assessment should always have a focus on accentuating the child&#039;s success, and on making improvements for the future. This simple formula can be applied to a student, who in other terms may have &quot;bombed&quot; or have &quot;aced&quot; the assessment. I approach them the same. There is always something positive to highlight in what they did, and there is always room for improvement. That should be our goal in assessment. To keep the child moving forward in the learning process.     </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2012/04/andrew-freeman-why-im-not-preparing-my-students-for-the-star-tests-april-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-63356</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcataeye.com/?p=5572#comment-63356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe one of the goals of assessment should always be to help the teacher refine what  they are doing. Under the government mandated standardized testing mechanism, however, the assessment directs the instruction in a very narrow way. Teachers know that in any given class they have a wide variety of diversity in regards to individual learning needs. Allow the teacher to direct the assessment to reasonably align with those individual needs. What good does it do to continuously pound a one-size-fits-all standardized exam down the throat of a child who is no way ready for it? Allow the teacher to refine their teaching of the class and of individuals based on what they see as being successful and unsuccessful.

This also requires a redefining of what we mean by &quot;assessment&quot;. It should never always be quantitative data. Assessment needs to incorporate qualitative observations, along with the story of the child. 

One of my personal beliefs also is that assessments should always have a positive outcome for the child. First, the assessment should be rich and truly offer the child an opportunity to share what they know, understand, comprehend - and when appropriate offer the opportunity for them to analyze, make an argument, or come to their own conclusion. Second, the outcome of the assessment should always have a focus on accentuating the child&#039;s success, and on making improvements for the future. This simple formula can be applied to a student, who in other terms may have &quot;bombed&quot; or have &quot;aced&quot; the assessment. I approach them the same. There is always something positive to highlight in what they did, and there is always room for improvement. That should be our goal in assessment. To keep the child moving forward in the learning process.     ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe one of the goals of assessment should always be to help the teacher refine what  they are doing. Under the government mandated standardized testing mechanism, however, the assessment directs the instruction in a very narrow way. Teachers know that in any given class they have a wide variety of diversity in regards to individual learning needs. Allow the teacher to direct the assessment to reasonably align with those individual needs. What good does it do to continuously pound a one-size-fits-all standardized exam down the throat of a child who is no way ready for it? Allow the teacher to refine their teaching of the class and of individuals based on what they see as being successful and unsuccessful.</p>
<p>This also requires a redefining of what we mean by &quot;assessment&quot;. It should never always be quantitative data. Assessment needs to incorporate qualitative observations, along with the story of the child. </p>
<p>One of my personal beliefs also is that assessments should always have a positive outcome for the child. First, the assessment should be rich and truly offer the child an opportunity to share what they know, understand, comprehend &#8211; and when appropriate offer the opportunity for them to analyze, make an argument, or come to their own conclusion. Second, the outcome of the assessment should always have a focus on accentuating the child&#039;s success, and on making improvements for the future. This simple formula can be applied to a student, who in other terms may have &quot;bombed&quot; or have &quot;aced&quot; the assessment. I approach them the same. There is always something positive to highlight in what they did, and there is always room for improvement. That should be our goal in assessment. To keep the child moving forward in the learning process.     </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Emberling</title>
		<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2012/04/andrew-freeman-why-im-not-preparing-my-students-for-the-star-tests-april-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-62864</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Emberling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcataeye.com/?p=5572#comment-62864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are there assessments that actually help teachers refine their teaching?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there assessments that actually help teachers refine their teaching?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Emberling</title>
		<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2012/04/andrew-freeman-why-im-not-preparing-my-students-for-the-star-tests-april-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-63334</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Emberling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcataeye.com/?p=5572#comment-63334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are there assessments that actually help teachers refine their teaching?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there assessments that actually help teachers refine their teaching?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Emberling</title>
		<link>http://www.arcataeye.com/2012/04/andrew-freeman-why-im-not-preparing-my-students-for-the-star-tests-april-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-63355</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Emberling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcataeye.com/?p=5572#comment-63355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are there assessments that actually help teachers refine their teaching?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there assessments that actually help teachers refine their teaching?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
