Forest Pot Grows Bring Range Of Destruction – August 31, 2012

Friday, August 31, 2012

Photos released Thursday by Humboldt County Third District Supervisor Mark Lovelace show illegal grading and cultivation in the mountains of Humboldt County. Stated Lovelace:
“On Wednesday, August 29th, I took a flight with 3 Department of Fish & Game officers to get a look at the scale and impact of marijuana grows in some of our watersheds. Without trying too hard, we were able to count 125 grows in the Van Duzen, 222 in the Mad River and Maple Creek, 82 in the Titlow Hill area and 10 in upper Jacoby Creek. Some appeared to be no different than a small farm, but far too many showed evidence of illegal and unpermitted clearcutting, grading, road building and water diversions. Regardless of their size and other differences, they all use precious water from these impoverished creeks and rivers, some of which now run dry in places. I should add the caveat, of course, that from the air it’s not possible to know for sure what is being grown inside any of these greenouses. Then again, the product being grown is not the issue; nor does it matter whether marijuana is being grown for medical purposes. What’s inside doesn’t change the impacts that are apparent.”

Daniel Mintz

Eye Correspondent

HUMBOLDT – A senior environmental scientist from the state’s Department of Fish and Game (DFG) has told county supervisors that there’s a regional “gold rush mentality” but its bounty isn’t gold, it’s medical marijuana.

He said unpermitted activities related to cultivation on private property are causing environmental problems.

The Board of Supervisors got another briefing on the destructive effects of unpermitted marijuana-growing activities at its Aug. 21 meeting. But the focus of this presentation was on medical marijuana production on private property.

Tony LaBanca of the DFG said cultivation has increased since medical marijuana was legalized. “I’m not speaking about cartel-sized grows today, I’m focusing on something that is much more on a rapid growth – what we like to refer to in our office as a ‘gold rush mentality’ here on the North Coast,” he told supervisors.

It’s not about “clandestine” backwoods grows on public lands, he continued. “These folks are in our front country, on private lands,” he said, adding that medical marijuana legalization has “allowed a new type of situation.”

Showing a series of aerial Google Earth images, LaBanca explained that private property grows are sucking water out of streams and rivers. A map of southern Mendocino County featured a pervasive cluster of dots and squares described by LaBanca as grow areas and greenhouses.

Watershed areas near Willits “provide water to the south fork of the Eel River in Humboldt County – that water is being intercepted in the headwaters of the south fork of the Eel,” he said. “We should be concerned about water being diverted prior to it getting to our location.”

Municipal water sources also provide marijuana irrigation, he continued. Projecting a Google Earth photo of southern Redway, LaBanca pointed out numerous orchard-like gardens which he said weren’t there the year before the photo was taken, suggesting annual crops of marijuana.

“This location takes water out of the south fork of the Eel,” LaBanca continued. “They have a water company in Redway which takes water and uses it for these types of domestic uses, agricultural uses.”

He said there’s been a puzzling recent trend – low river flows are being noted in wet years. While LaBanca acknowledged that numerous factors could be relevant, he said diverting water in summer and fall months is a problem and a 10,000 square foot outdoor marijuana grow uses 250,000 gallons of water in a five-month growing season.

Lack of screening on water diversion siphons causes juvenile fish deaths, he continued, and some grows are ripe with various types of pollution. “Concrete, fertilizers and other petrochemicals, trash, debris – all kinds of things are deposited in streams and near streams,” he said.

Another concern is use of “killing agents” – herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides. Rodent poisons have meat products that also attract predators and LaBanca said his agency is noting second-hand poisoning of fishers, martens, spotted owls and bob cats that have eaten poisoned rodents.

The state invests in restoration projects to benefit salmon and endangered predators like the spotted owl, he continued. “And what’s happening to them? We’re seeing them have another impact from another direction.”

Photos courtesy Supervisor Mark Lovelace

Showing more photos, LaBanca added that unpermitted road grading and forest clearing in grow areas has led to sediment loading and loss of riparian cover.

The DFG will work with growers on permitting their operations, LaBanca said, and outreach is one solution that’s being pursued. Some growers “would not come to us at any cost,” he said, but “I think there is a large contingent that is simply ignorant of environmental regulations and a lot of times, through our outreach process, we get people saying, ‘I want to be environmentally groovy, I want to be organic.’”

Responding to a question from Supervisor Ryan Sundberg on whether the DFG is willing to focus solely on growers’ farming practices, LaBanca said, “We will work with them – yes.”

The county is also working on regulating outdoor medical grows and County Administrative Officer Phillip Smith-Hanes said another draft of an ordinance will be before supervisors in late September, to be followed by community meetings on it.

Tags: ,

125 Responses to “Forest Pot Grows Bring Range Of Destruction – August 31, 2012”

  1. True enough that we don't decide that. It seems, however, that since the public can fly a plane in any unrestricted airspace over 500 feet from people and structures, anything in "plane" sight can be photographed and used as evidence. While it's tough to tell what is actually growing there, it's not as hard to see land use violations. We'll see if there's any decision in the case you quoted.

    #64141
  2. True enough that we don't decide that. It seems, however, that since the public can fly a plane in any unrestricted airspace over 500 feet from people and structures, anything in "plane" sight can be photographed and used as evidence. While it's tough to tell what is actually growing there, it's not as hard to see land use violations. We'll see if there's any decision in the case you quoted.

    #65770
  3. True enough that we don't decide that. It seems, however, that since the public can fly a plane in any unrestricted airspace over 500 feet from people and structures, anything in "plane" sight can be photographed and used as evidence. While it's tough to tell what is actually growing there, it's not as hard to see land use violations. We'll see if there's any decision in the case you quoted.

    #66865
  4. True enough that we don't decide that. It seems, however, that since the public can fly a plane in any unrestricted airspace over 500 feet from people and structures, anything in "plane" sight can be photographed and used as evidence. While it's tough to tell what is actually growing there, it's not as hard to see land use violations. We'll see if there's any decision in the case you quoted.

    #67770
  5. Ian Ray

    Mark – California v. Ciraolo

    #64142
  6. Ian Ray

    Mark – California v. Ciraolo

    #65771
  7. Ian Ray

    Mark – California v. Ciraolo

    #66866
  8. Ian Ray

    Mark – California v. Ciraolo

    #67771
  9. [...] state's Department of Fish and Game has been searching for marijuana fields using helicopters and Google Earth, but not for the reasons you think. Because of medical marijuana [...]

    #64144
  10. IAN-
    Looks like the courts are going to have another look at the same general idea.
    maybe they change their former ruling, maybe not.

    #64148
  11. IAN-
    Looks like the courts are going to have another look at the same general idea.
    maybe they change their former ruling, maybe not.

    #65750
  12. IAN-
    Looks like the courts are going to have another look at the same general idea.
    maybe they change their former ruling, maybe not.

    #66845
  13. IAN-
    Looks like the courts are going to have another look at the same general idea.
    maybe they change their former ruling, maybe not.

    #67750
  14. James Ashcraft

    well formulated!

    #65327
  15. James Ashcraft

    well formulated!

    #65772
  16. James Ashcraft

    well formulated!

    #66867
  17. James Ashcraft

    well formulated!

    #67772
  18. James Ashcraft

    Kevin Hoover – Of course! Regulation means taxes and revenue which also leads to job creation. Herds of cows and sheep do more damage to public land than Marijauna does!

    #65328
  19. James Ashcraft

    Kevin Hoover – Of course! Regulation means taxes and revenue which also leads to job creation. Herds of cows and sheep do more damage to public land than Marijauna does!

    #65773
  20. James Ashcraft

    Kevin Hoover – Of course! Regulation means taxes and revenue which also leads to job creation. Herds of cows and sheep do more damage to public land than Marijauna does!

    #66868
  21. James Ashcraft

    Kevin Hoover – Of course! Regulation means taxes and revenue which also leads to job creation. Herds of cows and sheep do more damage to public land than Marijauna does!

    #67773
  22. Kevin Hoover

    1. "Herds of cows and sheep do more damage to public land than Marijauna does!" Please cite your proof of that assertion. I imagine you have comparative studies and statistics?

    2. What if herd animals do cause more damage than cannabis? Does that mean the illegal clearcuts should be ignored, approved, what?

    #65329
  23. Kevin Hoover

    1. "Herds of cows and sheep do more damage to public land than Marijauna does!" Please cite your proof of that assertion. I imagine you have comparative studies and statistics?

    2. What if herd animals do cause more damage than cannabis? Does that mean the illegal clearcuts should be ignored, approved, what?

    #65774
  24. Kevin Hoover

    1. "Herds of cows and sheep do more damage to public land than Marijauna does!" Please cite your proof of that assertion. I imagine you have comparative studies and statistics?

    2. What if herd animals do cause more damage than cannabis? Does that mean the illegal clearcuts should be ignored, approved, what?

    #66869
  25. Kevin Hoover

    1. "Herds of cows and sheep do more damage to public land than Marijauna does!" Please cite your proof of that assertion. I imagine you have comparative studies and statistics?

    2. What if herd animals do cause more damage than cannabis? Does that mean the illegal clearcuts should be ignored, approved, what?

    #67774

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.