One Less Speed Hump On Old Arcata Road – December 16, 2012

Sunday, December 16, 2012
A Google Earth image of the now-removed speed hump at Old Arcata Road and Golf Course Road.

A Google Earth image of the now-removed speed hump at Old Arcata Road and Golf Course Road.

Kevin L. Hoover

Eye Editor

OLD ARCATA ROAD – Where five speed humps once encumbered speeders on Old Arcata Road south of Buttermilk Lane, now there are but four. Public Works has removed one following a now-dropped lawsuit for “inverse condemnation” filed by nearby residents.

Bob and Susan McPherson have lived in their 1929-vintage house for more than 40 years. It’s one more suited to Southern California than Humboldt, with lath and plaster walls, a tile roof and a stem wall foundation. The house was built on fill – fine-grained bay mud prone to liquifaction.

Thus it as with serious dread that the couple saw the City laying down a speed hump just over their fence.

“You’re going to hydraulically hammer our house,” Bob said he warned the City as the asphalt lump was being installed.

Sure enough, the built-to–crumble house  started shaking as soon as the speed hump was installed outside.

The initial impact of a vehicle striking the hump caused one jolt, then a second as the car landed on the other side.

Susan said the “bump-bump” was disqueting, but even more so “was watching the ripples in our coffee cups in the morning when big trucks go over it.” That may be why she calls the hump a “speed jump.”

“Every time, you’re sending these hammer blows through the house,” Bob said. “Hundreds of them per day. It accelerated the natural decay of our house tenfold.”

Under the vibrational onslaught, new cracks appeared and the chimney started pulling away from the house.

Another unintended consequence was all the items that apparently were jostled loose from vehicles traversing the hump, or jump. The McPhersons would routinely harvest all manner of property from humpside, and amassed a desultory detritus.

Their collection included lumber, part 0f a lumber rack, a bucket truck’s apron loaded with costly tools, an eight-foot round table, a wheelbarrow full of topsoil, coffee cups and cell phones. They sold the groundscores at a yard sale, helping recoup the $10,000 or so they expended on legal fees fighting City Hall.

Susan said removal of the speed hump actually increased safety by ending the rain of heavy objects constantly falling into the bike/pedestrian lane lane.  “I think we’ve eliminated a horrible hazard,” Susan said.

Hump removed

The newly unhumped stretch of Old Arcata Road. KLH | Eye

Apart from attorneys, the couple tapped specialists for potential expert analysis. A plaster expert said the house – which is on Arcata’s noteworthy structures list – said repairs could cost $30,000. Installation of a vibration-fighting foundation would have cost $54,000. “It was adding up into the hundreds of thousands,” Bob said.

The McPersons offered the City a deal – a lawsuit, or removal of the hump.

To verify the effect for the brewing lawsuit, Bob McPherson, who just happens to be a seismologist with Humboldt State’s Geology Department, borrowed a university seismograph to document the impacts. That sealed the speed hump’s fate.

“How do you argue with a seismograph?” wondered City Manager Randy Mendosa.

As a result, the hump was removed and a $250,000 claim against the City, which insurance would not have covered, was waived. As a condition of the settlement, no speed hump will be constructed 100 feet in either direction of the former hump site.

Bob maintains that “speed humps are really the wrong approach,” and for several reasons. He says the vehicles tend to slow down to hit the hump, then accelerate again, resulting in a net increase in fuel use.

“It seems to me, if you just put a cop there, you’d make money [on tickets],” he said. Susan wants to see a radar sign that flashes the speed at motorists.

The couple hadn’t been aware of the just-concluded Old Arcata Road Safety Committee meetings, but came to the same conclusion as attendees did – that shaming speeders with a webcam might be helpful.

With the hump gone, cars are back to speeding in the area, but the double bump and engine speed-up noise has gone away.

“You still hear the whoosh,” Susan said.

Tags: , ,

12 Responses to “One Less Speed Hump On Old Arcata Road – December 16, 2012”

  1. Quick and dirty fixes often create more problems than they solve. Good for the McPhersons.

    #64754
  2. Quick and dirty fixes often create more problems than they solve. Good for the McPhersons.

    #65614
  3. I remember when living in Germany they had forced S-turns with reflected barricades to force traffic to slow down. A possibility…..

    #64760
  4. I remember when living in Germany they had forced S-turns with reflected barricades to force traffic to slow down. A possibility…..

    #65615
  5. Kevin Hoover

    The only problem is that whatever slows down traffic also slows down police, fire and ambulances.

    #64762
  6. Kevin Hoover

    The only problem is that whatever slows down traffic also slows down police, fire and ambulances.

    #65619
  7. Anonymous

    Bob McPherson was one of the best teachers I had at HSU!

    #64770
  8. Anonymous

    Bob McPherson was one of the best teachers I had at HSU!

    #65616
  9. This past fall I noticed an Arcata Fire District fire truck responding to an emergency call out on Jacoby Creek Road. Only the fire truck was not arriving at the intersection of Jacoby Creek Road and Old Arcata Road from the north.

    You see because of the speed humps on Old Arcata Road, the fire trucks must drive south on US101 to the Bayside Cut-Off, then head back up Old Arcata Road to Jacoby Creek Road. I suspect the fire trucks take the 'long way around the barn' to avoid wear and tear to their apparatus running gear and suspension.

    So if you live down Jacoby Creek road and you die or your house burns for the worse (fires double in size every five minutes) so you can "civilize" miscreants with speed bumps, well, those are the trade-offs you've accepted.

    #64794
  10. This past fall I noticed an Arcata Fire District fire truck responding to an emergency call out on Jacoby Creek Road. Only the fire truck was not arriving at the intersection of Jacoby Creek Road and Old Arcata Road from the north.

    You see because of the speed humps on Old Arcata Road, the fire trucks must drive south on US101 to the Bayside Cut-Off, then head back up Old Arcata Road to Jacoby Creek Road. I suspect the fire trucks take the 'long way around the barn' to avoid wear and tear to their apparatus running gear and suspension.

    So if you live down Jacoby Creek road and you die or your house burns for the worse (fires double in size every five minutes) so you can "civilize" miscreants with speed bumps, well, those are the trade-offs you've accepted.

    #65617
  11. And here I thought a speed hump was reserved for Saturday night…

    #64799
  12. And here I thought a speed hump was reserved for Saturday night…

    #65618

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.